कह नहीं सकता कि बेतिया और मोतिहारी के समाचार पत्रों में यह खबर छपी है या नहीं! यदि अब तक नहीं तो इसे प्रकाशित होना चाहिए।
आप गूगल कीजिए #Hinduphobia देखिए दुनिया में क्या चल रहा है?
हम कश्मीर में अपने बंधुओं की हत्याएं नहीं रोक पा रहे जिनसे पूछकर गोली मारी गई कि “तुम्हारा धर्म क्या है”।
दूसरी तरफ कैसे The Scottish Parliament ने अपने सदन में Gandhian Peace Society की रिपोर्ट पर प्रस्ताव पास किया है। यह किसी शोधार्थी के लिए रिसर्च टॉपिक हो सकता है।
मोतिहारी के अनुरंजन झा ने Dhruva Kumar की टीम के सहयोग से 3 साल की मेहनत के बाद ये रिपोर्ट तैयार की है।
अनुरंजन झा पूछ रहे हैं, ”आप जरा गौर कीजिए कि हिन्दुस्तान में हम कहां चूक रहे हैँ।”
………………………………………….
The Scottish Parliament’s endorsement of the Gandhian Peace Society’s report, “Hinduphobia in Scotland: Understanding, Addressing, and Overcoming Prejudice,” presents a compelling research topic for scholars, particularly in fields like sociology, political science, religious studies, or diaspora studies. *The report, led by Anuranjan Jha from Motihari, Bihar, in collaboration with Dhruva Kumar and their team* , is a pioneering effort that took three years to complete. It marks the first UK parliamentary-recognized study on anti-Hindu discrimination, making it a significant case study for understanding religious prejudice, policy advocacy, and the application of Gandhian principles in modern governance.
Potential Research Topics
1. Sociopolitical Impact of the Report:
o How has the report influenced policy discourse on religious equality in Scotland?
o What role did cross-party support (e.g., MSPs like Ash Regan, Colin Beattie) play in its parliamentary acceptance?
o How does this motion set a precedent for addressing minority discrimination in Europe?
2. Gandhian Principles in Advocacy:
o How did the Gandhian Peace Society apply non-violence and social justice principles to combat Hinduphobia?
o To what extent does the report reflect Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy in addressing contemporary issues of religious prejudice?
*Role of Diaspora Leadership:*
o Analyze Anuranjan Jha’s leadership as a Motihari native in mobilizing a global dialogue on Hinduphobia.
o How did Dhruva Kumar’s background as a trade unionist and ALBA Party candidate shape the report’s political strategy?
3. *Empirical Analysis of Hinduphobia:*
o Investigate the report’s data, such as the 56% surge in anti-Hindu hate crimes (2019–2021) or workplace discrimination statistics (e.g., 93% of Hindu employees avoiding religious attire).
o How do specific incidents, like the vandalism of Dundee’s Shree Sanatan Mandir, reflect broader systemic challenges?
4. *Comparative Studies:*
o Compare Scotland’s approach to Hinduphobia with other nations’ handling of religious discrimination (e.g., Islamophobia in the UK or anti-Semitism in Europe).
o How does this report align with global human rights frameworks?
5. *Media and Public Engagement:*
o Explore the report’s global reach, with coverage in over 110 media outlets (e.g., ANI, The Tribune).
o How did platforms like Awaz FM amplify the report’s impact among Scottish and diaspora communities?
*Research Significance*
The report’s historic acceptance by the Scottish Parliament on April 8, 2025, via motion S6M-17089, highlights its relevance for studying minority rights advocacy. It offers a lens to examine how small communities (Hindus make up 0.3% of Scotland’s population) can drive legislative change. The involvement of Anuranjan Jha and Dhruva Kumar underscores the power of diaspora-led initiatives in shaping multicultural policies, making it an inspiring case for researchers interested in social justice, interfaith dialogue, or postcolonial studies.
*Suggested Methodology*
• Qualitative Analysis: Conduct interviews with Anuranjan Jha, Dhruva Kumar, or Gandhian Peace Society members to understand the report’s creation process.
• Quantitative Analysis: Analyze hate crime data or workplace discrimination statistics cited in the report.
• Discourse Analysis: Study parliamentary debates, media coverage, and public responses to trace the report’s influence.
• Comparative Case Studies: Benchmark Scotland’s motion against similar initiatives globally.
*Challenges*
• Limited access to primary data or stakeholders in Scotland.
• Potential bias in media narratives or political framing of Hinduphobia.
• Balancing the report’s advocacy tone with academic objectivity.
This topic is ripe for a researcher aiming to explore the intersection of religion, policy, and activism, with the Gandhian Peace Society’s work serving as a model for transformative change.