Dr Manmohan Vaidya
Akhil Bharatiya Karyakarini Sadasya of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh
Delhi: The ‘Self’ embedded in Bharat’s Swadeshi way of life encompasses multiple profound dimensions that go far beyond mere cultural expression. During 1964 to 1966, under the leadership of Dr. D. S. Kothari, a commission was constituted to evaluate Bharat’s education system. One of its significant conclusions was that Bharat’s intellectual domain had become Eurocentric, whereas it ought to be rooted in a Bharat-centric perspective.
This insight invites a deeper reflection through contemporary examples. The ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas is widely described by global media, including in Bharat, as a war in the Middle East. However, Bharat’s Ministry of External Affairs has recently begun referring to this region as West Asia. The geography has not changed, but the perspective has. The term Middle East reflects a European vantage point where Bharat is seen as the East and Japan as the Far East. As an independent nation, Bharat must define the world through its own lens. For Bharat, Europe is the West, Japan is the East, and the Gulf region is West Asia. This shift in perspective represents the essence of Swadeshi consciousness.
The British came to Bharat with the intention to rule, and accordingly, they framed laws with a punitive orientation, most notably the Indian Penal Code (IPC). In present-day Bharat, governance is rooted in the will of the people, where the objective is not punishment but justice. In alignment with this principle, the Indian Penal Code has been replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). This transformation signifies not merely a change in nomenclature but a deeper shift in philosophical orientation from rule to justice. Similar changes are unfolding across multiple domains.
As a nation, we are capable of accomplishing much more. Prior to colonial intervention, Bharat possessed a scientifically grounded system of time reckoning based on the movements of the Sun, Moon, and Earth. The names of months were derived from constellations, and our scholars could accurately predict solar and lunar eclipses even 50 to 100 years in advance. In contrast, the Western Gregorian calendar originally comprised only ten months. September, October, November, and December literally denote the seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth months. Subsequently, Julius Caesar introduced July, and Augustus added August, thereby altering the original numerical sequence.
Even today, festivals in Bharat are not observed according to English dates but in accordance with the traditional lunar tithi. Ram Navami is celebrated on Chaitra Shukla Navami, Raksha Bandhan on Shravan Purnima, Janmashtami on Krishna Ashtami of Shravan or Bhadrapada, Navaratri begins on Ashwin Shukla Pratipada, and Vijayadashami falls on Ashwin Shukla Dashami. Regardless of the corresponding Gregorian date, these observances remain anchored in tithi. This raises a pertinent question. If we consult auspicious timings while determining marriage dates, why should anniversaries and birthdays be confined to English dates alone? The insistence on tithi is not merely cultural but civilizational, rooted in a system that is ancient, scriptural, and scientific. It is an expression of our intrinsic self.
The contemporary practice of celebrating birthdays according to English dates, marked by midnight rituals, cake cutting, and superficial customs, stands in contrast to Bharatiya tradition, where the day begins in Brahma Muhurta, before sunrise. Observing birthdays according to tithi transforms the very ethos of celebration. One awakens early (before sunrise), performs ablutions, lights a sacred lamp before the Divine, seeks blessings from elders, takes noble resolutions, and commits oneself to societal good. Such observances foster harmony, values, and a spirit of collective joy within the family.
This is the essence of the Swadeshi way of life, where thought, time, conduct, and culture are aligned with one’s own civilizational self. Without confrontation or excessive expenditure, merely by transforming perspective, one can make life more meaningful, rooted, and authentically Bharatiya.
Education, Learning, and the Purpose of Life: Bharat’s ‘Swa’ Perspective
I recently came across a thought-provoking reflection. The author observes –
“I have met some uneducated but learned people and some educated unlearned people too.”
Education gives you a means to earn a livelihood, whereas learning is different from education. Learning gives you a purpose in life. If the purpose is clear and the direction is decided, you can set your priorities.
When there is a purpose and direction coupled with efforts, life flows like water in a river. The river chooses to flow between the limitations of its banks because it has to reach its goal, to be one with the ocean. Mere education and earning money in life is like water in a lake; however large it is, it stinks.
Books help you to learn the meaning and purpose of life. It is said that first we learn to read, and then we read to learn. By managing tasks, one can spare time for reading to learn. Like the fish lives in water, we live in time. How can a fish say that there is no water! Similarly, no one can say that he or she doesn’t have time. One has to prioritise tasks, and he can find time to read and lead a meaningful life by navigating the depths of learning beyond education.”
Therefore, life must not be confined merely to the pursuit of wealth; it must be anchored in a higher purpose. Achieving such a purpose requires resolve, waking before sunrise, followed by consistent effort and eventually disciplined habit. Once the waking time is fixed, the time of rest aligns automatically.
Within these two boundaries, life flows in balance, fostering both physical and mental well-being. If every household were to adopt the practice of rising before sunrise, it could transform both the direction and condition of life. Exceptions may exist for those engaged in night shifts or suffering from illness, but for most, practices such as regular exercise, yoga, and Surya Namaskar naturally become integral to life. This too reflects an essential dimension of Bharat’s intrinsic Swa, a harmonious alignment of discipline, purpose, and holistic well-being.
“To Give a Little More”: The Silent and Salient Ethos of Bharat
Before the advent of British rule, Bharat did not exist as a politically unified entity. There was immense diversity in language, modes of worship, and ways of life, with various kings ruling over the people of Bharat, framing different kingdoms. Yet, across this vast civilizational expanse, one enduring tradition could be observed for centuries. Whenever a liquid commodity such as milk or oil was measured and given, after filling the measure completely, a little extra would invariably be added.
Similarly, while weighing goods on a scale, even after the balance was achieved, a small additional quantity would be offered. This practice continues even today, especially in rural Bharat. It is not merely a style of commerce; rather, it reflects the intrinsic civilizational ethos of Bharat, its ‘Inner Self’. The sentiment behind it is clear: whatever value/money I receive, in return I must ensure that even by mistake I should not give ‘less’ to society, but a little more. This disposition of returning more to society is the essence of Bharat.
A Lasting Remedy to Corruption
Regrettably, modern education is increasingly shaping individuals into being self-centric, materialist, and driven primarily by economic gain. In contrast, the ordinary citizen of Bharat finds a natural joy in giving more to society. This is the innate disposition of Bharat. If this inner ethos is awakened and translated into conduct, corruption would find no space to exist. The guiding principle is simple: whatever remuneration or value I receive for my work, I must return more to society, never less under any circumstance. This is the true manifestation of Bharat’s swadeshi way of life and its civilizational self.
The Irish-born disciple of Swami Vivekanand, Sister Nivedita (Margaret Noble), articulated a profoundly significant idea concerning social life. She stated that in a society where people, instead of keeping the remuneration of their work to themselves only, share it with society, on the basis of this accumulated wealth (social capital) with the society, the society as a whole becomes prosperous and everyone in the society becomes prosperous. It is this social capital that leads to the prosperity of society, enabling every individual within it to progress. This is Dharma, not confined to any sect, way of worship, or religion, but a life philosophy that binds society into a cohesive whole.
Sister Nivedita further noted that in a society where individuals accumulate the fruits of their labour solely for personal gain without returning anything to society, a few in the society may appear affluent, but the society as a whole remains impoverished. Therefore, if this principle becomes an integral part of the Swadeshi way of life, the entire character of society can be transformed. For this, conscious and active participation of every individual is essential.
“Dharma” The Civilizational Ideal of Bharat
The guiding thought and conduct of Bharat have always been rooted in three principles: abundance in production, equity in distribution, and restraint in consumption. To regulate one’s consumption and dedicate what remains beyond one’s needs to the welfare of society with a sense of belonging is Dharma. Conversely, to pursue self-interest by causing harm to others or by depriving them of their rightful share is Adharma.
Keeping this spirit in mind, the leadership of independent Bharat adopted certain symbolic and idea-driven expressions. The motto of the Lok Sabha is “Dharmachakra Pravartanaya”, that of the Rajya Sabha is “Satyam Vada, Dharmam Chara”, and the Supreme Court of Bharat bears the inscription “Yato Dharmastato Jaya”. Even the wheel in the national flag represents the Dharmachakra.
Bharat is, at its core, a Dharma-centric civilization. When Artha and Kama, the pursuits of wealth and desire, operate within the discipline of Dharma, Moksha (the ultimate goal of a human being) naturally follows. Compassion is Dharma, while ego is sin. Therefore, life must maintain a balance between inner spiritual discipline and outer social service. Swami Vivekanand encapsulated this beautifully in the principle of serving living beings in the spirit of Shiva, that to serve man is to serve God, and regarded service to the poor as equivalent to worship of the Divine. The same meaning is conveyed in the saying, “Ekant me Sadhana aur Lokant me Seva”, meaning, Sadhana in solitude and Seva in public. Gurudev Rabindranath Thakur has put it beautifully. He says giving or donating to society is “Charity”, while giving back to society is “Dharma”.
This is the civilizational self of Bharat, this is its Swadeshi way of life.
In the eighteenth chapter of the Bhagavad Gita, it is stated that a person attains perfection by being devoted to their own rightful duty, and by worshipping the Divine through the performance of their own work.
Sant Dnyaneshwar expresses this idea with simplicity and depth, stating that offering one’s actions as flowers in worship to the all-pervading Divine present in society brings profound fulfilment. The essence of all these teachings is that every action of ours should be performed in the spirit of service to society. Just as we choose fresh, fragrant, and the finest flowers for worship, so too must our actions be pure, outstanding, and of the highest quality when dedicated to society.
This is the true Swa of Bharat. Let this become our nature, let this shape our way of life. Then our social and national life will become harmonious, prosperous, and deeply fulfilling. This alone is the Swadeshi way of life.